Title: The Matthew Livelsberger Manifesto Is a Smokescreen: Here’s What They Don’t Want You to Know

The Matthew Livelsberger manifesto, supposedly sent by an insider whistleblower, claims that the UAPs we’ve been observing are entirely man-made, attributed to advanced U.S. and Chinese military projects using gravitic propulsion. It suggests these “drones” are silent, produce no heat signature, evade detection on flight radar, and are being used for surveillance. Furthermore, it frames these sightings as evidence of Chinese aggression, alleging that submarines in the Atlantic are launching these crafts as a show of force. On the surface, it might seem like a plausible explanation, especially for skeptics looking for a “logical” answer. But the deeper you dig, the more this story unravels, revealing a calculated attempt to control the narrative, mislead the public, and obscure the truth.

Here’s what they don’t want you to see.

Let’s start with my theory. I believe the majority—around 90%—of what we’re seeing are non-human intelligence (NHI) crafts. These crafts are powered by electromagnetic propulsion, which explains their glowing lights, silent operation, incredible speeds, and seemingly impossible maneuvers. The remaining 10% are likely man-made drones, deployed by the military to create confusion and obscure the true nature of NHI crafts. These drones, while advanced by human standards, are far less capable than the real UAPs and likely make noise, unlike their silent counterparts. The military uses helicopters to mask this noise and create auditory confusion, making it harder for witnesses to discern which crafts are man-made and which aren’t.

The glowing lights reported in so many sightings are a key point of distinction. According to the manifesto, these crafts are being used for surveillance—but why would a stealth surveillance craft emit visible lights, especially at night? Lights would completely compromise stealth, undermining the very purpose of surveillance. This glaring inconsistency is never addressed in the manifesto. The truth is that these glowing lights are an unavoidable byproduct of electromagnetic propulsion, not gravitic propulsion as the manifesto claims. Electromagnetic systems ionize atmospheric particles or generate plasma, which naturally produces visible emissions. Gravitic propulsion, on the other hand, wouldn’t produce lights at all. If these crafts were truly using gravitic propulsion, they would be completely stealthy—no lights, no emissions, and no sound. This alone casts serious doubt on the manifesto’s claims.

The gravitic propulsion explanation also falls apart when you consider the extraordinary behaviors of UAPs. These crafts don’t just move quickly—they accelerate instantaneously, hover for hours, disappear and reappear, and execute sharp-angle turns at speeds that defy inertia and physics. Gravitic propulsion, even in theory, cannot account for these feats. Electromagnetic propulsion, however, provides a plausible explanation. It could generate the bursts of energy needed for such rapid, seemingly impossible movements. This is technology light-years ahead of anything human-made, and the manifesto’s insistence on gravitic propulsion feels like an intentional misdirection.

The claim that these crafts are being launched from submarines is another red flag. While it might sound like a convenient explanation for sightings near water, it doesn’t align with reports of UAPs seamlessly entering and exiting water at incredible speeds. Submarines, even the most advanced ones, cannot replicate the fluidity and agility described in these sightings. This narrative is designed to provide skeptics with a “logical” explanation while diverting attention from the possibility that these are NHI crafts using Earth’s oceans as a base of operations.

Adding to the confusion is the phenomenon of shapeshifting crafts. Numerous witnesses have reported glowing “orbs” that appear to morph into “drone-like” crafts, often with what seem to be FAA lights. However, these forms are always slightly off—whether it’s the placement of the lights, the shape, or the movement, something doesn’t quite add up. This suggests that NHI crafts are deliberately mimicking human-made drones, blending in just enough to ensure skeptics have something “logical” to point to. The military amplifies this confusion by deploying its own man-made drones, which likely account for only a small fraction of sightings. These drones are far less advanced than NHI crafts but are used strategically to create a smokescreen that keeps the public focused on human-made explanations.

Now, let’s talk about Dr. Steven Greer. Greer recently claimed that Matthew Livelsberger was one of his whistleblowers. But this connection feels far too convenient. If Livelsberger’s manifesto is part of a deliberate misdirection campaign—as the contradictions suggest—then Greer’s endorsement of him raises serious questions about his credibility. How can we trust Greer when he’s endorsing a narrative that falls apart under scrutiny? At best, he’s been misled. At worst, he’s knowingly participating in the same operation. Either way, this connection doesn’t pass the smell test. It feels like yet another layer of misdirection, designed to lend credibility to a story that’s riddled with inconsistencies.

The manifesto’s focus on China serves a broader agenda. By framing these sightings as evidence of Chinese aggression, it shifts attention away from NHI crafts and onto geopolitics. This tactic stokes fear of a foreign threat, unites the public against a common enemy, and justifies potential military escalation—possibly even World War III. The U.S. government has a long history of using fear as a tool for control, and this is no different. By presenting China as a looming threat, the military ensures that people remain focused on external enemies instead of questioning their own government or exploring the possibility of non-human intelligence.

Ultimately, the manifesto isn’t just flawed—it’s a deliberate effort to obscure the truth. Whether Livelsberger knowingly participated in this operation or genuinely believed what he was saying doesn’t change the outcome. The manifesto provides just enough information to seem credible while steering the public away from the reality of NHI crafts. This is misdirection on a massive scale, designed to pacify skeptics, keep the “logical” thinkers satisfied, and maintain the secrecy of a truth that has been buried for over 80 years.

The glowing lights, instant acceleration, silent operation, and shapeshifting phenomena—all of these point to technology far beyond anything human-made. The military’s man-made drones are likely primitive in comparison, but they’re being used strategically to confuse the public and hide the overwhelming evidence of NHI crafts. This isn’t about revealing the truth—it’s about controlling the narrative, keeping the public in fear, and maintaining the power structures that thrive on secrecy.