There is no reason Mahogany should not start over Glasgow next year.

I don't think this is unreasonable to say. Glasgow has been questionable pretty much all year, and he was really bad against Washington.

Mahogany is younger and has been a lot better. Admittedly a small sample size, but doesn't it make a lot more sense to give him some run than to keep playing the the soon-to-be 33 year old Glasgow who hasn't been half the player Mahogany has recently? See what we've got, especially considering how promising early results have been?

I understand loyalty but you have to give yourself the best chance to win. It makes the most sense.

Obviously this is assuming we re-sign Zeitler. If we don't, I guess they both start.